Anonymous UserChief Architect - Ethical Hacker at a tech services company
Anonymous UserSenior Security Specialist at a manufacturing company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."
"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."
"We are now able to completely monitor our environment so we can review what is there, which is a big win for us."
"This solution integrates easily and very well with other technologies."
"The solution is 100% stable. We really have had a great time working with it. It hasn't let us down."
"Compared to other solutions, the user interface is good."
"It is easy to use and deploy. It comes with user-friendly manuals."
"McAfee as a whole is a good solution."
"The most valuable feature is the correlation rules."
"It enables us to detect malicious threats, issues, or vulnerabilities in our network."
"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."
"What I think could be improved is how I get support."
"I would like to see improvements to the user interface."
"We cannot add new data sources to the most recent version."
"The user interface could be more user-friendly."
"The only drawback is that they don't have any packet capturing or network behavior analysis."
"McAfee is no more providing security updates on this product, and the enhancements to this product seem to have stopped. Moreover, we don't get proper support, and we struggle to get its support. It would be good if they can add some AI engine and out of the box use cases because it is currently limited to the same scenario and the same setup. I have done a POC for Securonix, LogRhythm. These products are much more ahead as compared to McAfee ESM. They have included multiple modules in the same solution. Correlation is very easy. If McAfee ESM can improve, especially in such implementations, then I believe it would be much better."
"It cannot integrate with our Next-Generation Firewall and few applications such as Cisco ACI."
"There should be support for multitenancy in the product."
"We acquired the IBM product because McAfee is slightly confusing to use, and it's broader."
"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"The cost is dependent on the customer's environment and requirements."
"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."
"The cost is all included. The finance department handles the financial part, and we mostly don't get involved in it."
"We renew our license annually."
"McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."
"The price is good. It's moderate. We follow a pay-as-you-go model. There are different models available, and they can also be monthly. You can choose monthly or yearly. It's very flexible. If our existing customers exceed the current plan, you can just call McAfee and get it extended."
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager - the foundation of the security information and event management (SIEM) solution family from McAfee delivers the performance, actionable intelligence, and real-time situational awareness at the speed and scale required for security organizations to identify, understand, and respond to stealthy threats, while the embedded compliance framework simplifies compliance.
Code42 Next-Gen DLP is ranked 5th in Data Loss Prevention with 2 reviews while McAfee ESM is ranked 11th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 11 reviews. Code42 Next-Gen DLP is rated 9.6, while McAfee ESM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Code42 Next-Gen DLP writes "Good technical support, a straightforward setup, and very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee ESM writes "A security information and event management solution with a useful search and reporting feature, but cloud integration could be better". Code42 Next-Gen DLP is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Carbon Black CB Defense, Digital Guardian and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas McAfee ESM is most compared with IBM QRadar, Splunk, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and Rapid7 InsightIDR.
See our list of .
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.