Cognizant ADPART vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cognizant Logo
910 views|217 comparisons
OpenText Logo
324 views|224 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cognizant ADPART and OpenText Silk Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."
  • More OpenText Silk Central Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    13th
    Views
    910
    Comparisons
    217
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    20th
    Views
    324
    Comparisons
    224
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ADPART
    Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cognizant ADPART is a Model-based testing product that enables organization get their products business ready 30% faster and ensure 100% quality coverage. 

    ADPART lets users model business flows and automates test design eliminating the need for manual authoring of test cases. 

    Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Transportation Company25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise80%
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cognizant ADPART is ranked 13th in Test Management Tools while OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools. Cognizant ADPART is rated 0.0, while OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". Cognizant ADPART is most compared with TFS, Tricentis Tosca and Conformiq, whereas OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.