CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    IBM Logo
    3,429 views|1,724 comparisons
    90% willing to recommend
    Featured Review
    Use CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL]?
    Quotes From Members
    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
    Here are some excerpts of what they said:
    Pricing and Cost Advice
    Information Not Available
  • "The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."
  • "Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."
  • "The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."
  • More UrbanCode Deploy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Emerging Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently.
    Top Answer:The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing. For example, driving to your home from the office is easy when there are one or two routes. With twenty routes, there is some… more »
    Top Answer:Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    6th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    3,429
    Comparisons
    1,724
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Elastic Server
    uDeploy
    Learn More
    Overview

    Elastic Server simplifies the process of creating application stacks for use on EC2 and other virtual environments. Instead of the painstaking manual downloading, configuration, building, and installation that is otherwise required when creating a complex stack, Elastic Server provides a menu-driven selection and build process.

    IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

    Sample Customers
    Geezeo, PayNearMe, AngelEye Camera Systems, CodeObjects, Imagination, MTech Communications, Quantum Retail, Trek10, Foley Carrier Services
    As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites.  However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Insurance Company24%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization59%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Insurance Company7%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise60%
    Large Enterprise34%

    CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while UrbanCode Deploy is ranked 6th in Release Automation with 27 reviews. CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is rated 0.0, while UrbanCode Deploy is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of UrbanCode Deploy writes "It offers OOTB plugins for middleware". CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas UrbanCode Deploy is most compared with GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Octopus Deploy and HCL Launch.

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.