We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"Grafana is able to connect with multiple data sources, unlike Elasticsearch."
"Plugin: Connecting Grafana to multiple APIs of leading monitoring tools and alerting tools."
"Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"Grafana's built-in integration with third-party tools, databases, and MQs is an amazing feature."
"The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable."
"What I found most valuable in Grafana is that it has a lot of integrations and features that I need for data processing and visualization."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
"The security needs to be improved, such as the capacity to add permissions on dashboards."
"The product's configuration for saving files could be improved."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring."
"The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring."
"I would like the ability to download my results into any format in order to share the information with my clients."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver). See our Coralogix vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.