We performed a comparison between Coralogix and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"We have all the policies available via drag and drop. It made it very easy."
"The entire offering and suite of tools that this solution provides have been very valuable. We are able to manage APIs on runtime on a cloud basis which has been very useful."
"I believe the API connectivity within the cloud marketplace is most valuable."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The developer portal is easy to integrate. It is easy to use, easy to integrate, and I like the developer portal."
"Its best feature is that its plugins are somewhat unique in the market. We have budgets, Prime membership, and pre-plugins available in the marketplace that we can use immediately."
"The auto-creation of the API documentation is useful."
"Overall, the platform is pretty good, I cannot say which one specific feature is good. The idea of an API manager is really interesting."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Anypoint could be improved by making it more open and configurable for small companies, who tend not to consider the solution as it's expensive and requires a lot of costs upfront."
"The API gateway and API runtime are too heavy, which means that it is not suitable for microservices."
"Licensing costs should be reduced, it's quite expensive."
"To improve Anypoint API Manager for the next release, it should focus on better consumption scalability, especially for smaller APIs."
"We find that the enterprise level is lacking scalability."
"I'd suggest more control over MQ restarts and greater transparency in traffic management."
"The solution is expensive."
"I'd like more monitoring and analyzing features included in the future."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Coralogix is ranked 13th in API Management with 7 reviews while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 47 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Elastic Search, whereas MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise. See our Coralogix vs. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.