Compare Coverity vs. Veracode
Sponsored
Use Accurics? Share your opinion.
 | Anonymous User Security Consultant at a tech services company |
 | Srinivasa Rao Kuruba Manager, Information Technology at Broadcom Corporation |
Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"Coverity is quite expensive."
"The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."
"The price is competitive with other solutions."
"It is expensive."
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works."
"They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey."
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization."
"I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good."
"Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."
"If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."
"Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."
"We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: It provides reports about a lot of potential defects.
Top Answer: It is expensive.
Top Answer: Its price can be improved. Price is always an issue with Synopsys.
Top Answer: It's comprehensive from a feature standpoint.
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Synopsys Static Analysis
At Accurics™, we envision a world where organizations can innovate in the cloud with confidence. Our mission is to enable cyber resilience through self-healing as organizations embrace cloud native infrastructure. The Accurics platform self-heals cloud native infrastructure by codifying security throughout the development lifecycle. It programmatically detects and resolves risks across Infrastructure as Code before infrastructure is provisioned, and maintains the secure posture in runtime by programmatically mitigating risks from changes. Accurics enables organizations of all sizes to achieve cloud cyber resilience through free cloud-based and open source tools such as Terrascan™.
Coverity® gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix.
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.
Learn more about Accurics
Learn more about Coverity
Learn more about Veracode
Automation Anywhere, NBA, GroundTruth, ServiceMax, Navis, Edcast
MStar Semiconductor, Alcatel-Lucent
State of Missouri, Rekner
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company6%
Media Company14%
Government14%
Retailer14%
Transportation Company14%
Computer Software Company31%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider16%
Retailer4%
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company10%
Computer Software Company10%
Healthcare Company8%
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise60%
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise88%
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise48%
Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Coverity is ranked 10th in Application Security with 6 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security with 23 reviews. Coverity is rated 7.4, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Coverity writes "Straightforward to install and reports few false positives, but it should be easier to specify your own validation and sanitation routines". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Prevents vulnerable code from going into production, but the user interface is dated and needs considerable work". Coverity is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx, Klocwork and Fortify Application Defender, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, OWASP Zap and HCL AppScan. See our Coverity vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Application Security vendors.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.