CRMNest vs Eptica WCS Suite Comparison 2024 | PeerSpot

Eptica WCS Suite

CRMNest

32 views|16 comparisons

Eptica WCS Suite

106 views|93 comparisons

Executive Summary

Download the complete report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CRMNest and Eptica WCS Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Salesforce and others in CRM.

To learn more, read our detailed CRM Report (Updated: March 2024).

Download the complete report

768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Anonymous User

Architect at a tech services company

WCS vs Hybris vs ATG - Feature Smackdown

They say "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder", so if you are a purist in one of these technologies you would probably never agree to my comparison matrix, However these are my personal opinion, From my experience standpoint I have longest exposure to WCS Commerce Suite and the least with ATG Commerce. Feature comparison are always shallow and should not be taken at face value they serve a purpose and it is up to you to decide what best suits your implementation, I feel all three of these are excellent commerce products, they serve a different market segment and will continue to have a space for themselves for years to come. ...so at the end of the day you need to do your homework to see what best fits your needs.. IBM WCS(V7, FEP5) Hybris(5.0) Oracle ATG(10.2) Development Environment +1 Complexity associated with development is very high, The system resources required for running IBM RAD and associated WAS Runtime is highest among the three, Organizations are often forced to use VDI which slows down the developer productivity vastly. +3 Hybris probably ranks no. 1 in this category, the best in terms of supportability for lighter development environment, it can run in an eclipse environment with tomcat container +2 ATG development environment includes Eclipse, ATG Eclipse Plugin, JBoss JEE Environment +1 Works only on IBM Websphere Application Servers +3 Hybris Server… Read more →

Ranking

100th

out of 169 in CRM

Views

32

Comparisons

16

Reviews

0

Average Words per Review

0

Rating

N/A

55th

out of 169 in CRM

Views

106

Comparisons

93

Reviews

0

Average Words per Review

0

Rating

N/A

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Salesforce and others in CRM. Updated: March 2024.

768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparisons

More CRMNest Competitors →

More Eptica WCS Suite Competitors →

Also Known As

WCS Suite

Learn More

Qtonix Software

Video Not Available

Video Not Available

Overview

CRM tool designed for young startups, businesses, and firms that are still using spreadsheets or using a costly CRM. The best part - CRMNest is completely customizable and you can choose to pay a one-time for life with 24x7 support.

Eptica WCS Suite platform is designed around a central Knowledge Base and Eptica Linguistic Services, an advanced linguistics technology system. Combined with powerful workflow, this ensures every incoming request is handled efficiently and consistently across all text based digital channels.

Sample Customers

CMMRIS, FractaPipes

Easyroommate, L'Occitane en Provence, Vivastreet, Ageas Insurance Solutions, Britannia Hotels Group

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Salesforce and others in CRM. Updated: March 2024.

768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CRMNest is ranked 100th in CRM while Eptica WCS Suite is ranked 55th in CRM. CRMNest is rated 0.0, while Eptica WCS Suite is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CRMNest is most compared with , whereas Eptica WCS Suite is most compared with .

See our list of best CRM vendors.

We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.