Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar?
Srprogmagr567
Ranking
36th
Views
175
Comparisons
128
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
37th
Views
185
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAPSonar
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
Crosscheck Networks
Video Not Available
Overview
Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar provides automated testing of each API independent of client, device or intended Consumer. Automatically generating a UI to provide immediate feedback to developers, testers, integrators, and security professionals. Validating each API independently shortens the critical path and supports concurrent Agile development. Fully automated, SOAPSonar requires no scripting or script maintenance, reducing time and skill level needed. Integration with variety test management software packages and providing detailed reports for progress tracking. Regression testing can be automated, providing early identification of changes to the API or versions. Support for message and protocol layer identity standards allows for cloud testing.

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Sample Customers
San Diego State University, Rumson Capital Advisor, Techlogix
Migros Bank AG
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is rated 0.0, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is most compared with , whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.