Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Crosscheck Networks Logo
175 views|128 comparisons
OpenText Logo
1,719 views|1,168 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar and OpenText Silk Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar?
SrinivasPakala
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."
  • More OpenText Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    36th
    Views
    175
    Comparisons
    128
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    25th
    Views
    1,719
    Comparisons
    1,168
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAPSonar
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    Crosscheck Networks
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar provides automated testing of each API independent of client, device or intended Consumer. Automatically generating a UI to provide immediate feedback to developers, testers, integrators, and security professionals. Validating each API independently shortens the critical path and supports concurrent Agile development. Fully automated, SOAPSonar requires no scripting or script maintenance, reducing time and skill level needed. Integration with variety test management software packages and providing detailed reports for progress tracking. Regression testing can be automated, providing early identification of changes to the API or versions. Support for message and protocol layer identity standards allows for cloud testing.
    SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
    Sample Customers
    San Diego State University, Rumson Capital Advisor, Techlogix
    Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools. Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is rated 0.0, while OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is most compared with , whereas OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.