Compare Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs. Silk Test

Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is ranked 33rd in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test which is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is rated 0, while Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is most compared with SoapUI Pro and Parasoft SOAtest, whereas Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar Logo
682 views|270 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
10,020 views|3,576 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
33rd
Views
682
Comparisons
270
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
14th
Views
10,020
Comparisons
3,576
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
747
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAPSonarSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
Crosscheck Networks
Video Not Available
Micro Focus
Overview
Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar provides automated testing of each API independent of client, device or intended Consumer. Automatically generating a UI to provide immediate feedback to developers, testers, integrators, and security professionals. Validating each API independently shortens the critical path and supports concurrent Agile development. Fully automated, SOAPSonar requires no scripting or script maintenance, reducing time and skill level needed. Integration with variety test management software packages and providing detailed reports for progress tracking. Regression testing can be automated, providing early identification of changes to the API or versions. Support for message and protocol layer identity standards allows for cloud testing.SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
San Diego State University, Rumson Capital Advisor, TechlogixKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email