We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"The product is stable."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"FortiClient's most valuable features are that it's easy to install and connect and has OTP on email IDs and two-factor authentication."
"Remote connectivity is its most valuable feature."
"It’s easy to use."
"The integration of VPN services with endpoint security is valuable."
"The Fortinet FortiClient is simple to use."
"The ability to reroute traffic from the user, connecting you to the internet rather than passing through our network area, is very useful."
"I find it very easy to configure and also very stable."
"The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass, single point of management."
"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"The solution is very expensive."
"I haven't found that that solution does anything amazing."
"The licensing feature of the product requires improvement since whenever the license expires, the tool logs out its users automatically, irrespective of whether they are on the network or not, which can be problematic for me."
"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly for users to do not have as much of a technical background."
"The only thing that is lacking in this product is the support. Their support can be improved."
"The solution's access control could be improved."
"The tool is expensive."
"The features of Fortinet FortiClient could be improved."
"While we like patch management, it would be nice if it could handle patch management for other solutions, like Microsoft."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 16th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 85 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
