We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable."
"The product is stable."
"The endpoint security, antivirus and firewall are the most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security."
"The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"The reporting capabilities are a valuable feature. In enables more visibility on our network."
"It also allows multifunctionality within a single platform."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."
"It has been protecting us for many years, and we hope it will continue to do so for many years to come."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."
"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"One of the drawbacks is that it is not 100% secure."
"The endpoint has room for improvement because it's restrictive, it's very sensitive. Sometimes it can delete something that you need and so sometimes you have to disable the antivirus."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"There are times the solution has some additional software added that is not fully integrated properly, such as Exchange Group Sheild. It is quite old and is not fully integrated properly and could be improved."
"The tool could provide more advanced protection."
"The solution needs to offer better local technical support."
"The software download features could stand improvement."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and BigFix, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.