We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Sophos EPP Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"Great cloud management."
"Sophos EPP Suite stands out with its user-friendly dashboard and strong web filtering features for enhanced online security."
"This product is quite stable and there are no problems with it."
"It's easy to deploy."
"We bought it because it was cost-effective."
"In terms of the Firewall, the EAP assist, the simple interface and the reporting features are quite good for clients. It's very easy to understand and to navigate the Dashboard."
"It's very simple to use. The managing of the endpoints is very easy."
"The protection that this solution offers us is strong."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"The solution is very expensive."
"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"The solution’s performance could be improved for the end-users."
"Sophos EPP Suite demands significant resources just to operate. For example, it takes up more than 50% of the resources on our laptop to run it. So, even if we buy a laptop i7 and use 50% resources for Sophos, it will cost us more because every computer needs energy. I don't know why or what the exact problem is."
"There are also issues with the compatibility of the OS. When using Sophos with Windows and devices, most of them work well, but as soon as we work with macOS and Linux, many issues arise that we do not want to have."
"The encryption features are not as good as McAfee's."
"In terms of improvement, the main challenge is setting up VPN connections."
"There could be enhancements made to the DLP."
"Technical support needs to be improved."
"In my country, having an on-premises deployment model is preferred. In this part of the world, on-premises is still the way many companies want to go. Therefore, they should supply some sort of option that allows for that reality."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while Sophos EPP Suite is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 52 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2, while Sophos EPP Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos EPP Suite writes "The solution provides endpoint detection and response with a nice-looking dashboard". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Sophos EPP Suite is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Seqrite Endpoint Security, Trellix Endpoint Security, Coro and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Sophos EPP Suite report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
