CyCognito vs Picus Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyCognito Logo
318 views|218 comparisons
Picus Security Logo
2,769 views|1,710 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyCognito and Picus Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."
  • "There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."
  • More Picus Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools.
    Top Answer:Pricing can be subjective, as it depends on the value the software provides to each customer. However, the pricing is in line with competitors in the market, so maybe around seven out of ten, where… more »
    Top Answer:The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required.
    Ranking
    Views
    318
    Comparisons
    218
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,769
    Comparisons
    1,710
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    620
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Pentera logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Cymulate logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    SafeBreach logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    AttackIQ logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    XM Cyber logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    CyCognito
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Legacy security testing approaches may help security teams find and remediate risks on-premises and directly managed infrastructure. But, they are no match for the rapidly expanding attack surface caused by modern, highly distributed IT ecosystems.

    CyCognito was founded by veterans of national intelligence agencies who understand how attackers exploit blind spots, and who recognized the need for a radical new approach to threat assessment. Our mission is to build the next-generation security risk assessment product category: solutions that autonomously discover, enumerate, and prioritize each organization’s security risks based upon a global analysis of all external attack surfaces and attack vectors that a real attacker would likely exploit.

    Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.

    Sample Customers
    UTA, BERTELSMANN, WIPRO
    Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyCognito is ranked 11th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Picus Security is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 4 reviews. CyCognito is rated 0.0, while Picus Security is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Picus Security writes "Breach and attack simulation software that provides network, endpoint, and email vectors". CyCognito is most compared with Censys Attack Surface Management, Cortex Xpanse, IBM Security Randori Recon, Cymulate and Pentera, whereas Picus Security is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, AttackIQ and XM Cyber.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.