Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has a single pane of glass, and it integrates well with other software.""The project management and task management features work well. It's a decent product in that regard.""Even when the connection to the server is lost, the monitoring continues without interruption.""The alerting system helps us determine what are high level alerts, and what are alerts which can wait for a day or two. We catch RAID failures, hot servers, bad drives (or predicted failures on drives), etc.""We support nine different nonprofits, and the billing took the manager three or four days working on spreadsheets. When I finished automating everything with Datto, we cut everything down to a couple of hours. That's a substantial cost savings on the billing side.""The remote tool is nice. If a user needs assistance, I don't have to tell the user to do anything. I just ask the user if I can remote in, and 30 seconds later, I have remoted in. It has been really handy.""Automation, in terms of the standard patches and standard updates, and remote support are valuable. When it does the standard Windows and patches, it works really well. This is something they focus on. Remote support is also something they focus on quite a bit, and it works really well. Being able to get to an agent or a client computer right away is very helpful.""I also like how Datto integrates seamlessly with the Autotask ticketing system."

More Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Pros →

"The most helpful feature is script deployment because we can create whatever we want to deploy on our devices. This works in a cloud environment, where we previously relied on Active Directory. Since the start of the COVID outbreak, all the staff members began working from home, and most of the people there did not use the VPN to transfer the policies.""I like being able to get a picture of what's happening on a computer. I can just click on it, and I can see the CPU usage and the memory usage and what services and programs are currently running. I can connect remotely to a computer. All these are very useful.""The network device is a good feature. In a place where you need to monitor your firewall switches, you can add an RMM tool and monitor it on the same screen on the same setup for the same client. Network devices are very good.""The integrated backup and the scripting are good.""We like that this solution is in real-time, it gives us real-time monitoring.""The details and the reports they provide are what I like, especially the details for almost the whole computer and the OS type.""The solution provides an administration panel where we can see what is happening on our client's stations, such as events, alerts, and all the software installed.""Remote support has been very handy. It also lets us know if there are failing hard drives or Windows issues."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pros →

Cons
"Be prepared to spend a lot of time on conversions if you have a lot of clients.""The CRM capabilities are not very good. It's clunky and could work a lot better than it does. There are no marketing add-ins, for example.""I would like the ability to remotely manage configuration and settings on individual units. Some organizations have a certain device configuration that needs to be consistent across all computers. For example, if we have computers that cannot go to sleep or hibernate because they're being accessed remotely, we need to be able to quickly configure those computers to not hibernate. With Datto, there is no easy and/or direct way to accomplish this. I can't create a group called No Hibernate and drag all those computers to that group so that they do not go into hibernation. There is no easy way to put in a policy or a procedure like that. It's still back to going to each computer and doing it by hand, which is what I'm trying to get away from. I want to automate and simplify as much as possible. I write code and scripts to do most of my work anyways. The intention is to get away from me having to be so hands-on.""They have a tab to provide information about the type of hardware the computers have. One thing they don't specify is what model of hard drive the computers have. Identification of storage models would be nice.""We would like to see a little more functionality when monitoring network devices, such as switches and routers.""My most significant criticism is Datto is a complex product that takes a while to understand, but that could be said of almost any solution at the same level. It depends on where you're starting from. You have to rework all your workflows, and it's some heavy lifting if you want to get it right.""The only area where I see room for improvement is the ability to delay the application of patches for a set number of days.""The actual setup and the automation of their product are horrific. When you buy it, there is nothing out of the box. You have to custom design it for everything you want it to do. You pay for implementation, but they don't really do a whole lot to help you get it going. I know it does a lot more than what ours is set up to do, which is frustrating. When I've demoed other systems, their setup is so much better. When you pay for their setup, there is so much more, whereas I just feel like we didn't get a very good setup."

More Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Cons →

"The SentinelOne integration is not great.""I would like to see notifications sent with SMS.""There are disconnection issues sometimes.""The product looks a bit old-fashioned.""We haven't had it for very long, and we're finally getting comfortable with it. The biggest improvement probably would be a little more clarification. It has few exclamation points or attention-getters when there is a computer that doesn't have the up-to-date patches, etc. However, it's not specific in terms of what you need to do. Sometimes, it says it requires a reboot, and you reboot it, but the same message still shows up. Sometimes, the messages that it gives you about how to resolve an issue are not very easy to understand.""The alerts and reporting could be done a little more clearly. They are quite cryptic, and quite often, we seem to get a lot of reports just for a computer rebooting or going offline for a couple of minutes, which doesn't seem like it's that big of a deal. Reporting could be refined and improved, and they can make it easy to decipher the reports.""The reporting could be more customizable. RMM pulls a vast amount of data, but you need to filter through it to get a decent executive report each month. I'm pulling reports all day through the XML file and such to get the information our executive needs. They don't want a 34-megabyte Excel spreadsheet, but the overview only provides limited information, like a basic breakdown.""There is quite a bit of delay on the portal where we receive monitoring information from the endpoint agent on the remote device. Sometimes it gets stuck with no live response from the device, and you have to refresh the portal just to make sure that it's projecting the right information."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AEM is a lot more scalable as you just pay per agent instead of having to purchase expensive licenses."
  • "We had to pay out some overtime for a few problematic sites. Sites on domain networks are incredibly easy to install. We learned a few tricks that streamlined the process, but in the beginning, it was a bit tedious."
  • "It goes by how many endpoints you have. It is about $3,000 a month for us. If we can't figure it out ourselves and need additional help to set it up, we would have to pay for that."
  • "The license typically depends on the number of endpoints. On the RMM side, I think we're paying around $2,250 per endpoint. Then there is also a license per user and tech, so that comes out to about a hundred bucks per tech, give or take."
  • "It fluctuates on the number of computers you have. Depending on the number of computers you have, it can fluctuate anywhere between $5 to $10 per computer per month, which is not too bad. I am not aware of any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee. It was one flat rate per device."
  • More Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's expensive and out of our budget."
  • "We use SolarWinds RMM on a pay-as-you-go monthly basis, so the cost can be highly variable because it depends on a few factors such as how many devices you need to support and what extra features you want to use. The more devices you have, the more you'll pay, and the same goes for extras."
  • "There is a license required for this solution."
  • "I haven't paid a whole lot of attention to that since I set it up. It has per-user licensing. If I remember it correctly, it worked out to about $10 a month per user. There were no additional costs. It was pretty straightforward and simple."
  • "Out clients pay monthly for the license of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management."
  • "As I'm not part of the procurement team and because I'm 100% technical, I'm not that familiar with the costs associated with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, but I can say that in my location, particularly here in Sri Lanka, it's more expensive than other RMM solutions. I'm working for an Australian IT MSP, and over there, the solution isn't as expensive, but where I'm located, it is, so this is the reason why sometimes, clients don't go with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. Licensing cost is also the reason why my organization is looking into Kaseya RMM. My current organization merged with another organization that's using both Kaseya RMM and Connectwise."
  • "The product is fairly priced."
  • "The solution is not very expensive."
  • More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Even when the connection to the server is lost, the monitoring continues without interruption.
    Top Answer:The only area where I see room for improvement is the ability to delay the application of patches for a set number of days. Currently, when patches become available, you have to either approve or… more »
    Top Answer:While the solution is a nice product, it may require some adjustments to be made in comparison to other products like N-central. However, Datto not only offers RMM software but also acts as a… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution in our organization, and we also integrate it into one of our clients in the US. We used it for monitoring initially. We monitor all the computers' updates and specs. We also use… more »
    Top Answer:The details and the reports they provide are what I like, especially the details for almost the whole computer and the OS type.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,098
    Comparisons
    1,183
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    965
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    1,453
    Comparisons
    953
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    944
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Autotask EM, Autotask Endpoint Management, Datto RMM
    N-able Remote Monitoring & Management, SolarWinds MSP Remote Monitoring & Management, MSP RMM, SolarWinds RMM, SolarWinds Remote Monitoring and Management
    Learn More
    N-able
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Autotask Endpoint Management is everything you need from an RMM solution, and it is all managed On Autotask’s customizable dashboards.

    RMM software designed for next-level protection

    Defend Windows and Apple devices with flexible, real-time remote monitoring and management, and a simple dashboard highlighting critical information during operational peaks.

    Patch Microsoft and more

    Keep devices compliant and secure with flexible patch management that easily allows MSPs to patch every aspect of the MSFT Environment and beyond.

    Sample Customers
    Wessex Networks, Base2, Valiant Technology, Technology Services Group, TechGuru
    NetSys Network Systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise40%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business85%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    Buyer's Guide
    Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is ranked 8th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 8 reviews while N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is ranked 6th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 13 reviews. Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is rated 7.8, while N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Datto Remote Monitoring and Management writes "A solution that functions optimally even when the connection to the server is lost". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management writes "User-friendly and allows you to do different activities on a single interface, and gives you visibility into multiple devices, but its reporting interface and report generation could be improved". Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is most compared with Atera, Microsoft Configuration Manager, PRTG Network Monitor, Kaseya VSA and NinjaOne, whereas N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is most compared with N-able N-central, Zabbix, NinjaOne, ConnectWise RMM and Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management report.

    See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

    We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.