We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub and Informatica Cloud Test Data Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, TIBCO, Reltio and others in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions."The most valuable feature of this solution is that it seems to be more of a drag and drop interface."
"The most valuable features of Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub are the ability to do data integrations, APM Management, MDM, and data catalog."
"We use the administrator to create different interfaces. We developed APIs for specific applications like data validation between systems. We have our own product and base it on the Boomi interfaces that generate this type of data validation."
"The most valuable feature is that it's very easy to develop the processes and we have been using it for a long time. At that time, no other tool was available, and it was the best product. When we first got it, I don't think it was a Dell product back then. We upgraded to the cloud last year. Today, it's still the best because it's very user-friendly, and the user interface is also very user-friendly. We can easily develop the processes quickly."
"One of the most valuable features is that I don't need to buy a subscription for any functionality. With Informatica Cloud Data Management, I have all the functionality and features available. If I need to make an integration, I can go to that integration service. If I need to mask, provide, or clean some information, I can easily just pick up that feature and use it. It's very simple, and I have all the functions and capabilities I need to work with data."
"The solution's scalability is high."
"Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub could improve by having a ChatGPT AI tool to solve problems and develop quicker."
"The price could be better. It would also be better if they stopped changing the icons every six months. Whenever they change it, users have to adapt to them again."
"The reporting needs to be improved to help get more KPIs in the longterm. Now, the system keeps only three months."
"We have problems in some scenarios where there are messages in the queue and would require some support."
"Its cloud-based version has a few limitations compared to the on-premise version."
"One thing Informatica could improve is the way IPUs are used. Each customer purchases a certain amount of IPUs per month, but you can use more or less than that defined quantity. The only problem is if you don't use the all your IPUs, they don't carry over into the next month. I think customers should have the ability to transfer unused IPUs into the next month or year. This improvement could help give customers more flexibility, especially since cloud solutions need flexibility in how we use and pay for them."
More Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Informatica Cloud Test Data Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is ranked 7th in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 5 reviews while Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is ranked 10th in Test Data Management with 2 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is rated 7.8, while Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub writes "A user-friendly cloud-native master data management platform that enables rapid process development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Test Data Management writes "Has good stability and an easy initial setup process". Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is most compared with Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance, Informatica PIM, Microsoft MDS and Semarchy xDM, whereas Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is most compared with .
We monitor all Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
