We performed a comparison between Dell PowerEdge M and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers."It helps us to manage multiple chassis from a single website."
"I have compared Dell EMC to other solutions and have found it to be good. The SAN and LAN traffic, manageability, and upgradability are all good."
"The tool's most valuable features are high availability and scalability. Its integration is easy."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution integrated well."
"The networking features for administration and working with the server are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Dell PowerEdge M is iDRAC."
"The solution offers remarkable flexibility, reliability, and extensive software support."
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"In terms of improvement, it should also offer a hyper-converged option."
"Dell PowerEdge M lacks GPU nodes and doesn't have a direct solution for GPUs."
"The set up is complex"
"It requires time to transition to the new generation."
"Can be improved by being proactive in making changes that could improve the solution."
"More interconnections with third party equipment and limited I/O selection."
"There is room for improvement in scalability."
"We have had some issues with the vendor's support that we have received. When you open up a support case with Dell they send a partner to assist you and in our experience, they are lacking knowledge about the solution. There are times when you need professional support from the vendor that knows the solution well."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dell PowerEdge M is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 15 reviews while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews. Dell PowerEdge M is rated 8.4, while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge M writes "Average pricing and good feature sets but is complex to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". Dell PowerEdge M is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE Superdome X, Cisco UCS B-Series, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE BladeSystem, whereas Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Super Micro SuperBlade and Fujitsu CX1000.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
