Compare Dell PowerEdge M vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series
 Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021. 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012. |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"If we would not have gone with the vendor we might have been charged unnecessarily for packages we did not need." | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs. 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 3,911 Comparisons 3,242 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 477 Rating 8.0 | Views 472 Comparisons 407 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 42% of the time.  Compared 24% of the time. Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. Compared 3% of the time. | Compared 8% of the time. Compared 8% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Primergy BX900 Series | |
Learn | |
| Dell EMC | Fujitsu |
Overview | |
The Dell PowerEdge M-Series blade servers address the challenges of an evolving IT environment by delivering leading enterprise classfeatures and functionality. The M-Series delivers a unique array of options configured to meet the needs of your IT environment both now and in the future.
| The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX900 S2 chassis is the rock-solid foundation for Fujitsu's blade ecosystem, providing a reliable, flexible and efficient platform for building a converged infrastructure. The system provides a modular approach to create an IT infrastructure. The chassis includes all needed infrastructure elements such as power supplies and fans, networking, and management. The Fujitsu blade server is easy to upgrade, maintain and customize. Inside, you can mix and match almost any combination of server storage and connection blades to run your choice of operation systems and applications. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Dell PowerEdge M | Learn more about Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series |
Sample Customers | |
| Newport City Homes, Neuroblastoma and Medulloblastoma Translational Research Consortium (NMTRC), Georgian College, AgreeYa Solutions, IIHT Cloud Solutions, Arizona State University, AudienceScience, University of the Incarnate Word (UIW), The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Holy Cross School | Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi Geospasial |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company28% Comms Service Provider24% Government8% Media Company6% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dell PowerEdge M is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 2 reviews while Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is ranked 11th in Blade Servers. Dell PowerEdge M is rated 8.0, while Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge M writes "Initial set up complicated, but after, easy to configure and use, many packages available". On the other hand, Dell PowerEdge M is most compared with HPE Synergy, Super Micro SuperBlade, HPE Superdome X, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE BladeSystem, whereas Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is most compared with Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE BladeSystem.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.