We performed a comparison between Mirantis Container Cloud and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the most valuable feature is its scalability because it is easy to work with. Even though I haven't fully removed it before, it's simple to get started and develop further. It's comparable to working with languages like C++ and Python. Python. It is easy to understand and more user-friendly."
"Mirantis Container Cloud operates similarly to how we interact with databases. It provides a comprehensive platform for deploying and managing containerized applications across cloud environments."
"The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward."
"The solution containerizes software."
"It is a compact, complete solution that performs well."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"The product's most valuable feature is cloud simulation to predict application behavior on the cloud."
"The product is easy to use."
"The biggest benefit for us was the time frame to complete a ticket. It went from approximately a week and a half to two weeks down to about three days."
"The most valuable function is the SecureChange where it is able to automate everything from the validation of the rules to the pushing of the rules."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it reduces both the time required and the number of errors when making changes."
"We can get reports with Tufin at anytime. We can have automated reports, even with security and compliance."
"The Automatic Policy Generator saves time because we are able to identify the required policy when a client doesn't know what he needs."
"This has helped us to better clean up and audit changes to the firewall policy."
"Comparing the rules and policy browser is valuable to me. It gives me the ability to pull running configs and be able to analyze them without having to go directly into the firewall."
"The clarity around the auditing provides the most value for us."
"It would be very nice to have a GUI that can be used by any administrator, and not just people who have experience with Docker."
"With the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable."
"Integration with Windows is something that can be improved."
"When it comes to the integration part, it's the basic functionality, but for any product, at the end of the day, security is extremely relevant. I personally feel like you have to constantly strive towards being more secure. You can never be 100% secure, and you have to work more toward security. It's as simple as that."
"An improvement would be automated testing."
"The orchestration and tracing should be improved."
"This product will only be useful if it can successfully run legacy applications in the cloud."
"More integrations with other platforms would be beneficial."
"I would like to see more configuration options on next-generation firewalls, defining possible standards for devices."
"I would like the application to have faster response times. E.g., the dashboard may take up to two minutes to load. Or, when we do the topology seating its two and a half hours. I would like to get those times down and increase the efficiency of the product there."
"The biggest area where I see a need for improvement is some of the documentation and training stuff. It does a really good job of hitting the big concepts, but it needs like another layer deeper of actually getting into some of the details of how to do some of the things. Conceptually, I understand how the product works, but now how do I start building stuff and integrating it into my environment."
"There are some missing features we'd like to see them add in the future."
"They are a little bit behind on some of their support for the Palo Alto firewall platform. I'd like to see that catch up, specifically around importing certain objects."
"The change workflow process is getting better. I wish it was a little more customizable. Right now, my biggest issue is that it wants to optimize everything we put in. Sometimes, we need a rule to be more readable, and we want it to go in a specific way. Sometimes, it's difficult to get Tufin to accept that. It wants to optimize and reduce the number of ACLs. On the compliance side, sometimes you just want more ACLs, so it's more readable for an auditor."
"I would like to see an improved reporting model that can be flexible for us to generate our own reports. The data's already there."
"The hardest piece is getting the matrix built."
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 14th in Container Security with 29 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 20th in Container Security with 180 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher and Snyk, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
