• Home
  • DocStar ECM vs. Fabasoft Folio [EOL]

DocStar ECM vs Fabasoft Folio [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Epicor Logo
DocStar ECM
Read 7 DocStar ECM reviews
172 views|94 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Fabasoft Logo
Fabasoft Folio [EOL]
views| comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DocStar ECM and Fabasoft Folio [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and...
* A/P Automation * H/R On boarding * Client/Vendor File Management * Contract Management
Use Fabasoft Folio [EOL]?
Ranking
24th
out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
Views
172
Comparisons
94
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Enterprise Content Management
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
docSTAR eclipse
Learn More
Epicor
Fabasoft
Overview
Helping businesses translate vision into action for more than 20 years, DocStar offers delivers a flexible and innovative enterprise content management and process automation platform. Easy to implement and use—both in the cloud and on premises—DocStar proven technology and global process expertise empowers organizations to operate at peak performance, navigate change, and grow. By scaling and modernizing operations and enabling greater collaboration, DocStar allows data and transactions to flow efficiently throughout your organization. With increased visibility among employees, customers, and partners, we deliver better business outcomes such as increased auditability and greater ease of compliance.

Fabasoft Folio takes care of the consistent, secure and reliable document management within a company as well as for the implementation of digital business processes.

With features for Enterprise Content Management, Collaboration, Workflow, audit-proof Archiving and Records Management, Fabasoft Folio sustainably increases the competitiveness of companies.

Sample Customers
Gillette Pepsi CompaniesUnited Way of KnoxvilleUniversity of MichiganMohawk PaperCleveland IndiansThe City of CamdenPenn Foster Career SchoolCapital Cardiology AssociatesCollier Restaurant Group
ExpertPlan
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business73%
Midsize Enterprise27%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DocStar ECM is ranked 24th in Enterprise Content Management while Fabasoft Folio [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Content Management. DocStar ECM is rated 9.6, while Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of DocStar ECM writes "It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and contract management". On the other hand, DocStar ECM is most compared with , whereas Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.