"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."
"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level."
"When we deployed it, right out of the box we were able to stand up Performance Management within two weeks, in our production environment, with full discovery and relevant information, actual information, that we could use in our command center, our 24/7 operations center."
"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him."
"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."
"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."
"The integration to the other products that we use: NFA, we use ADA, we use Spectrum; and CAPM integrates all those into a single pane of glass."
"When devices are having performance issues, it proactively build dashboards which allow us to go and do health checks, and resolve problems before they become an issue."
"Easy access to resources of our cloud."
"It helps to plan how you can scale up your environment, and it gives an overview of your entire infra."
"Global synchronization errors. Sometimes it just doesn't finish in time due to the load."
"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."
"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."
"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."
"Policies could be improved."
"This solution's implementation process could be quicker. They could also optimize the hardware requirements."
"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."
"I would like to have more tasks, graphs, and possibilities for linking to the graphs and reports added to the solution."
"It should have more reporting features. It will help in getting more reporting information."
"It needs to improve the capacity planning."
Earn 20 points
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure Capacity Planning with 31 reviews while OpenText Cloud Optimizer is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure Capacity Planning. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while OpenText Cloud Optimizer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Optimizer writes "Gives an overview of the entire infrastructure and helps with the optimization and capacity planning". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, Zabbix and OmniPeek, whereas OpenText Cloud Optimizer is most compared with BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization.
See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
