We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"The product is stable."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"The most valuable features for me in ESET Endpoint Security are the antivirus feature and detection."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the management."
"The pricing is good."
"It's a very user-friendly product."
"The overall security capability of the product is pretty reliable."
"The most valuable feature in ESET Endpoint Security is the game mode to restrict notifications."
"This solution blocks the brand new malware threats."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"They need much better integration with Azure AD."
"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"There are some new antivirus technologies that rely on AI, artificial intelligence. ESET does not have this technology right now."
"I don't know if it's possible but I'm always looking for better protection."
"I've had a few other instances where the program stops running, and then you have to restore and reset it."
"The new versions only support no operative systems in Mac and do not support operative systems."
"Data Leak Protection is is what we are searching for at the moment. It is not included with ESET."
"Sometimes, ESET sends alerts within my own network that cause confusion. That is, it might warn about contamination, or that the VM has crashed, but it doesn't go further than that. It just shows me the alert and sometimes I am not sure what to do about it."
"The product could have better integration with third-party products that would help extend functionality."
"They can improve ransomware protection, and there should be cloud sandboxing for Mac."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.