Compare ENEA Polyhedra vs. FileMaker

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases while FileMaker is ranked 4th in Non-Relational Databases with 1 review. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0, while FileMaker is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FileMaker writes "User-friendly and a great learning tool". ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas FileMaker is most compared with FoxPro.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Polyhedra Logo
39 views|17 comparisons
FileMaker Logo
339 views|241 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
Views
39
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
Views
339
Comparisons
241
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
497
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn
ENEA
Video Not Available
Apple
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.Cross-platform relational database application
Offer
Learn more about ENEA Polyhedra
Learn more about FileMaker
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMDVUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental
We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.