• Home
  • Everteam vs. Objective ECM

Everteam vs Objective ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Everteam Logo
Everteam
90 views|54 comparisons
Objective Logo
Objective ECM
Read 1 Objective ECM review
547 views|501 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Everteam and Objective ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Everteam?
Anonymous User
The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place.
Ranking
30th
out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
Views
90
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
Views
547
Comparisons
501
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Ever Team
Learn More
Everteam
Objective
Overview
EVER TEAM's Enterprise Content Management (ECM) product offering for 2011 is based on the Content, Case and Compliance trilogy, delivering a wide range of ECM solutions on top of three core engines, companion solutions and extensions.

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Sample Customers
MAIF, Mutualit_ Sociale Agricole, Qatar General Insurance, SMI Mutual Insurance, ODDO&CIE, Qatar National Bank, SGBL, Jeddah Municipality, Lebanese General Security, Ministry of Higher Education, National Institute of Statistics, National Water Company, Office of The Prime Minister, Al Fardan, Mango, Tatex, Najran University, University of Barcelona, University of Hikmeh
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government33%
Financial Services Firm9%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Everteam is ranked 30th in Enterprise Content Management while Objective ECM is ranked 17th in Enterprise Content Management. Everteam is rated 0.0, while Objective ECM is rated 4.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". Everteam is most compared with , whereas Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.