We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."
"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."
"It is very easy to use."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.