We performed a comparison between ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Nagios Network Analyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is scalable."
"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."
"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."
"It is highly customizable and can be integrated well with third-party software."
"I have found that it has a good GUI and user-friendly administration."
"The solution is useful for monitoring network devices."
"Network tracking is the most valuable feature of Network Analyzer."
"Its initial setup process is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good system monitoring. It's easy to manage your network, as well as your hardware and software. It's really useful."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The network monitoring feature, especially, stands out to me."
"There needs to be more support."
"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."
"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."
"It has an old-fashioned interface."
"The bandwidth for its front-end version needs enhancement."
"There are some loopholes you need to be aware of from a security perspective."
"I think the reports can be improved. They're adopted."
"There is room for improvement on the setup side."
"It's very hard to install materials. You need a lot of documentation. They should make it easier to install and configure the solution."
"The graphics and reports can be a little bit better."
"They need to have some automation models embedded in them."
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is ranked 11th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 3 reviews while Nagios Network Analyzer is ranked 10th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 9 reviews. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is rated 8.6, while Nagios Network Analyzer is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 writes "A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nagios Network Analyzer writes "User friendly, cloud scalability, with surpassed return on investment goals". ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Forescout Platform and Corelight, whereas Nagios Network Analyzer is most compared with Vectra AI and Darktrace. See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Nagios Network Analyzer report.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
