Compare F5 VIPRION vs. Kemp LoadMaster

F5 VIPRION is ranked 11th in Application Delivery Controllers with 3 reviews while Kemp LoadMaster is ranked 7th in Application Delivery Controllers with 6 reviews. F5 VIPRION is rated 8.6, while Kemp LoadMaster is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of F5 VIPRION writes "Excellent for internal business core applications and has the ability to scale up as necessary ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kemp LoadMaster writes "Robust, scalable, cost-effective, and has many templates for load balancing traffic of different types". F5 VIPRION is most compared with Citrix NetScaler ADC, whereas Kemp LoadMaster is most compared with HAProxy , F5 BIG-IP and NGINX Plus. See our F5 VIPRION vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
F5 VIPRION Logo
44 views|30 comparisons
Kemp LoadMaster Logo
5,579 views|4,512 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use F5 VIPRION? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 VIPRION vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
There are several levels of module so a company can upgrade if necessary.The solution itself is perfect. It's easy to configure and we haven't had any initial issues with the hardware or power supply.The most valuable feature is the vertical scaling of the application infrastructure.

Read more »

I like the way this solution handles multiple SSLs in different domains while still load balancing.We really like the performance of this solution.The security features are the most valuable features of this solution.With Kemp 360 Central, our customers get a nice overview of their Kemp products and an easy way to upgrade firmware on all devices from a single interface.Exchange load balancing and reverse proxy for Skype for Business are key features.Edge Security Pack is valuable because of the way it separates between critical infrastructure and the public internet.

Read more »

Cons
It's unfortunate that the network firewall isn't really a next generation firewall.It's hard to scale down the solution. You need to buy another product in order to do this.The initial setup is complex but it is manageable.

Read more »

Although Kemp is very user-friendly, it lacks a more custom configuration.The GUI is rather technical and complex, so it could be improved by making it simpler and more user-friendly.To make it a perfect ten out of ten it would need better connection logging. If there is an active connection, that there is better logging. It should also have better management monitoring tools.The auth website of ESP is really lacking. It’s not responsive (mobile friendly) and the procedure of changing the website is difficult. We tend to avoid using pre-auth for that reason.Several elements of the GUI need work. For example, if you have many content switches, it’s difficult to find the ones you need. And where is the search feature?If you want logging for SMTP traffic, you have to enable ESP, which requires you to define allowed IP addresses. That’s irritating, to say the least.It lacks an officially supported, well-written SCOM Management Pack.They need to improve the UI environment. Currently, it's hard to navigate and use product.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Licensing is yearly and I am going to guess that it is CAN $2000.00.The license varies according to the number of megabits.It has a great price for the solution they offer.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
44
Comparisons
30
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
458
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
5,579
Comparisons
4,512
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
377
Avg. Rating
8.6
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
VIPRIONLoadMaster Load Balancer
Learn
F5
Kemp
Overview

At F5, we give our customers the freedom to securely deliver every app, anywhere—with confidence. All F5 products are highly programmable and integrate into any environment, whether on premises or in any cloud. To date, 48 of the Fortune 50 companies rely on F5 to deliver apps that customers and employees can securely access at any time, on any device, from any location.

Kemp LoadMaster provides High Availability, Scalability and Security for Application Delivery. Optimized load balancers for Hybrid Cloud and Public Cloud deployments. Available for Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS.

Offer
Learn more about F5 VIPRION
Learn more about Kemp LoadMaster
Sample Customers
City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post OfficeKent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT€ Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Insurance Company14%
Comms Service Provider13%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 VIPRION vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.