• Home
  • Fabasoft app.test [EOL] vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

Fabasoft app.test [EOL] vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft app.test [EOL] and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fabasoft app.test [EOL]?
Srprogmagr567
Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
37th
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
185
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
Fabasoft
OpenText
Overview

Fabasoft app.test is the tool for functional software test automation in the Fabasoft product realm. Fabasoft app.test focuses on the automation of tests in a way that simulates how a real user would interact with the applications, i.e. by driving the user interface in the web browser.

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Sample Customers
Envisage Information Systems, Computer Sciences Consulting, Österreichische Post AG
Migros Bank AG
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft app.test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Fabasoft app.test [EOL] is most compared with Ranorex Studio, whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.