Fabasoft Folio [EOL] vs Hyland Perceptive Content comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft Folio [EOL] and Hyland Perceptive Content based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Enterprise Content Management
Views
167
Comparisons
122
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ImageNow
Learn More
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview

Fabasoft Folio takes care of the consistent, secure and reliable document management within a company as well as for the implementation of digital business processes.

With features for Enterprise Content Management, Collaboration, Workflow, audit-proof Archiving and Records Management, Fabasoft Folio sustainably increases the competitiveness of companies.

Perceptive Content is a scalable content services platform that manages the entire content lifecycle, from capture to disposition. Flexible functionality across multiple business applications, integration with virtually any business application and a simple-to-use interface help Perceptive Content transform internal processes and the customer experience. Perceptive Content helps users work smarter by surfacing content in context with other relevant business information. Digital documents can be viewed simultaneously, which promotes enhanced collaboration and communication among employees, customers and vendors. Locating relevant documents in the context of a business process increases customer satisfaction and employee productivity. Automated lifecycle management helps organizations comply with their records and retention policies, which reduces the risk of compliance violations and resulting fees and fines.

Sample Customers
ExpertPlan
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
University20%
Government16%
Computer Software Company9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise69%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft Folio [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Content Management while Hyland Perceptive Content is ranked 12th in Document Management Software. Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Hyland Perceptive Content is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hyland Perceptive Content writes "With workflows, a group of people can be working on appeals and forward them all to one queue". Fabasoft Folio [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Hyland Perceptive Content is most compared with Hyland OnBase and Box.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.