We performed a comparison between Faiss and Milvus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and others in Open Source Databases."The product has better performance and stability compared to one of its competitors."
"Milvus has good accuracy and performance."
"The solution is well containerized, and since containerization is quick and easy for me, I can scale it up quickly."
"It could be more accessible for handling larger data sets."
"Milvus' documentation is not very user-friendly and doesn't help me get started quickly."
"Milvus has higher resource consumption, which introduces complexity in implementation."
Faiss is ranked 11th in Open Source Databases with 1 review while Milvus is ranked 12th in Open Source Databases with 2 reviews. Faiss is rated 7.0, while Milvus is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Faiss writes "Works efficiently with smaller data sets, there could be an integration with automated products ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Milvus writes "The solution has good accuracy and performance, but it has higher resource consumption". Faiss is most compared with Chroma, Elastic Search, Qdrant, Pinecone and OpenSearch, whereas Milvus is most compared with Elastic Search, Chroma, LanceDB, OpenSearch and Redis.
See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors and best Vector Databases vendors.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.