We performed a comparison between FileAudit and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."
"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"The updates management and central management console could be improved."
"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."
"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
Earn 20 points
FileAudit is ranked 42nd in Log Management with 3 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management. FileAudit is rated 9.0, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of FileAudit writes "A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". FileAudit is most compared with ManageEngine File Audit Plus, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
