FioranoMQ vs WSO2 Carbon [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fiorano Logo
28 views|17 comparisons
WSO2 Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FioranoMQ and WSO2 Carbon [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
28
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Message Queue (MQ) Software
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Carbon
Learn More
WSO2
Video Not Available
Overview
FioranoMQ is a scalable, secure, and fast Java Messaging Server delivering high-performance, reliable, low latency solution for demanding enterprise applications. Fiorano’s enterprise backbone seamlessly integrates heterogeneous IT systems improving operational efficiency, business agility and performance. With comprehensive support for standards-based communication, connectivity and transformation, FioranoMQ minimizes proprietary dependencies while providing a powerful communication backbone that can be extended easily, allowing real-time delivery of data spanning multiple applications and platforms.

WSO2 Carbon redefines middleware by providing an integrated and componentized middleware platform that adapts to the specific needs of any enterprise IT project - on premise or in the cloud.

Sample Customers
IG Index, UC Berkeley, Schlumberger Oil Fields, Credit Agricole Titres, FairEx International Financial Systems Ptv Ltd, FinScope, Large Hedge Fund, LiquidityHub, Scottrade, Thomas Weisel Partners, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commission Junction, Connect First, Flytxt, Xylo, Wireless Matrix Corp, Korea Telecom, Qwest Communications
Bdigital, M-creations, Yenlo, Codenvy, Ohio Automobile Club
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FioranoMQ is ranked 20th in Message Queue (MQ) Software while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Message Queue (MQ) Software. FioranoMQ is rated 0.0, while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Carbon [EOL] writes "It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs". FioranoMQ is most compared with , whereas WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.