Compare FireEye Email Security vs. Micro Focus Voltage SecureMail

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use FireEye Email Security? Share your opinion.
Use Micro Focus Voltage SecureMail? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Email Security. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We do annual licensing for ESA and SMA together, and possibly SmartNet support. Packaged together, the cost is just under $38,000.""In addition to the standard licensing, there is a cost for SMARTnet as well.""Pricing depends on your environment and which model you want to buy.""Licensing costs depend on how many users there are. It could range between $5 and $7 per month, per user.""The license was not per user, the license model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly.""There were no other costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point.""It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee."

More Cisco Email Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features are Advanced Malware Protection, URL filtering, and of course Reputation Filtering.
Top Answer: The reporting functionality needs to be improved.
Top Answer: I have experience as an SE for IronPort as well as a private consultant. I have used this solution in multiple… more »
Top Answer: The solution's most valuable feature is its simplicity. It's very user-friendly.
Top Answer: The reporting aspect of the solution needs improvement. The solution needs to offer antivirus and antispam features onto… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for messaging security and sandboxing.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security AppliancesVoltage SecureMail, Micro Focus SecureMail, HPE SecureMail, SecureMail
Learn
Cisco
FireEye
Micro Focus
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

FireEye Email Security delivers dynamic defense to detect attacks from the very first time they're seen and blocks the most dangerous cyber threats including malware-laden attachments and URLs, credential phishing sites and business email compromise attacks. Email-borne cyber attacks are targeted, automated and hidden amongst millions of messages, easily morphing before signatures can be created.

Micro Focus Voltage SecureMail is the best of breed end-to-end encrypted email solution available for desktop, cloud, and mobile that is scalable to millions of users while keepingPersonally Identifiable Information (PII) and Personal Health Information (PHI) secure and private. This level of secure email communication gives organizations the confidence to transition from paper to electronic communication.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Email Security
Learn more about FireEye Email Security
Learn more about Micro Focus Voltage SecureMail
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, IndraNorthshore Utility District, Luz Technologies, Air Academy Federal Credit Union, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, State of Missouri, City and County of San Francisco, Denver Public Schools, Vodafone, Go Auto, Stater Bros. MarketAdvencia
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
Healthcare Company13%
University6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company21%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business1%
Midsize Enterprise63%
Large Enterprise35%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Email Security. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
FireEye Email Security is ranked 9th in Email Security with 1 review while Micro Focus Voltage SecureMail is ranked 32nd in Email Security. FireEye Email Security is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Voltage SecureMail is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of FireEye Email Security writes "Simple to use and does a good job of protecting systems from malware". On the other hand, FireEye Email Security is most compared with Forcepoint Email Security, DMARC Compass, Fortinet FortiMail, Symantec Messaging Gateway and Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, whereas Micro Focus Voltage SecureMail is most compared with .

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.