We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices."
"Version 9.1 has been an improvement on previous versions. It's a good solution for SMB."
"This solution is very easy to implement and use. The interface is user-friendly."
"The most valuable aspect of Fortinet FortiNAC is the control it offers."
"It's a very good solution and one thing I have noted is its simplicity and the ease of the set-up process."
"With FortiNAC, we don't need to configure the mass client site or access points. For example, we don't need to configure the switching site for a client's site. With Persistent Agent, it makes it much easier."
"The tool provides us with a list of devices that tries to connect to our network. It offers us a lot of network visibility."
"The device fingerprinting feature allowed for easy creation and enforcement of access policies."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"Its technical support needs improvement."
"Keeping the hard disk on the one series will be easier for the distributor and will keep the prices lower for the customer."
"The product must make its UI similar to other Fortinet products."
"The implementation process needs improvement. Right now, it's somewhat complicated. They could create some templates to facilitate implementation. Right now everything is done manually, and it just takes a really long time at the initial setup."
"This solution could be more agile."
"I hope that Fortinet can add a feature with a remediation mechanism when you find a broken piece so that you can click on something and download the needed update or resolve the firewall issue more easily. Currently, we have to use an external remediation server to download updates."
"The response and resolution time for technical support issues need to be improved."
"We have some stability issues with the solution, the network drops out too often."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Sophos Network Access Control, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.