Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Grafana Loki comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
10,122 views|5,670 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Grafana Labs Logo
2,840 views|2,462 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Grafana Loki based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Grafana Loki Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It supports SQL for logging and reporting. Log data is inserted into the SQL database for log view and report generation.""The scalability is good. It is also good in the cluster nodes. You can make multiple FortiAnalyzer clusters groups, and you can distribute the logs between these FortiAnalyzer nodes. In other words, you can expand the scale.""The most valuable feature is the capability to create a customized dashboard.""The features that our customers have found most valuable are their different type of reports including the drill down report, as well as the flexibility to connect to any number of appliances which can be connected to it centrally.""The initial setup is pretty straightforward.""The solution is very easy to deploy.""The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer are the GUI and there is automation that can be done with playbooks and mini-books.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten since, in our company, we have never experienced the solution crashing or having any other issues."

More Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Pros →

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the tool's GUI. The solution's GUI is very user-friendly.""Loki also utilizes the same service discovery mechanism as used by Prometheus. So, whatever labeled metadata you see in Prometheus, you have the exact same metadata in the Loki system. Given this level of intricacy and the attempt to address these challenges, I firmly believe that Loki deserves praise for the work.""The most valuable feature is the capability to set up alerts, which becomes necessary when we need to receive notifications for specific events.""The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is an open-source tool that is stable and flexible.""We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.""The most valuable feature of Grafana Loki is the dashboards which are really simple to create.""I appreciate the capability to process logs from microservices and seamlessly integrate them into Grafana.""The tool can be used in multi-cluster environments."

More Grafana Loki Pros →

Cons
"It is very important that FAZ can support FortiController as the architecture designed for the network. FortiController should be registered in FAZ at least for event logs.""It should have customized reports as well. While it currently has them, you need to write a script which is not straightforward.""The only issue that I can see is with the cost. For example, if you buy support for one year, you are messed up next year. It's better to buy another gateway.""The integration between specific tenants and FortiAnalyzer can be simplified when utilizing a multi-tenant EMS for our FortiClient.""Pricing-wise, it not affordable for the normal customer. Most of the people want to see different types of reporting, but FortiAnalyzer's fee is a little bit difficult.""One of the main disadvantages is not having a direct link to the security policy when you see something in the log.""We'd like to see more embedded features.""Fortinet FortiAnalyzer could improve the user interface, and the experience of users receiving the reports and tracking could be better."

More Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Cons →

"In Grafana Loki, the creation of metrics is not so easy, making it an area that could be made easier.""My main concern is the recommended production-grade setup. They suggest using tools like Tanka or Jsonnet. They should simplify the process to increase adoption.""Enhancing speed could be a game-changer, and while it might vary depending on the application, it's a factor worth exploring.""The solution has shortcomings regarding security monitoring-oriented features that need improvement.""We encountered certain limitations when it came to alerting, particularly when dealing with specific data sources.""We had a well-structured dashboard with a functional query. However, an issue arose when the Kubernetes pod restarted. The statistics from our Grafana query would reset, dropping to zero and starting anew. This was particularly noticeable with linear graphs, which are expected to show consistent growth.""The Docker container partition feature needs improvement as they do not reuse the space and goes into a pending state.""There is a need for some change in the alerting types of the product. In short, a few changes in the alert area are needed due to minor shortcomings."

More Grafana Loki Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its worth spending on FortiAnalyzer if you have multiple firewalls in your network."
  • "The hardware cost and services contract are fair."
  • "​It depends upon the company.​"
  • "The cost and pricing should be in accordance with the calculation of log storage capacity for a time period required for historical analysis."
  • "All Fortinet programs come at a good price."
  • "We have several products including Fortinet Wireless, FortiGate Firewalls, and FortiAnalyzer, which are bundled together and cost approximately $50,000 USD annually."
  • "We have around 12 devices and yearly we spend approximately $14,000."
  • "The price is quite expensive. Fortinet products are very expensive. That is something which they should also look at, because if you compare Fortinet product to, say, Sophos for example, Fortinet is really high and that's the only thing which is a drawback for most users."
  • More Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."
  • "My company doesn't need to pay for the licensing cost of the solution."
  • "We use a free version."
  • "The pricing structure varies based on the number of users; there might be specific taxes to pay for it."
  • "The solution is open source."
  • "I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product."
  • "Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."
  • More Grafana Loki Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The reporting features, which offer customization, real-time insights, and compliance support, are particularly noteworthy aspects.
    Top Answer:The pricing model is subscription-based. It involves payment for both the license and ongoing support. I would rate it seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:It would be beneficial to enhance the streamlining of the generation of automated reports related to compliance, such as PCI DSS or HIPAA, based on the logs collected. Automated reports focusing on… more »
    Top Answer:We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.
    Top Answer:Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution.
    Top Answer:There are a few features in the solution's enterprise version that are not given in the normal basic version. Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    10,122
    Comparisons
    5,670
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    415
    Rating
    8.0
    14th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    2,840
    Comparisons
    2,462
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is a powerful platform used for log management, analytics, and reporting. The solution is designed to provide organizations with automation, single-pane orchestration, and response for simplified security operations, as well as proactive identification and remediation of risks and complete visibility of the entire attack surface.

    Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Features

    Fortinet FortiAnalyzer has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Advanced threat detection capabilities
    • Centralized security analytics
    • End-to-end security posture awareness
    • Integration with FortiGate NGFWs, FortiClient, FortiSandbox, FortiWeb, and FortiMail
    • Incident detection and response
    • Playbook automation
    • Event management
    • Security services
    • Analytics and reporting

    Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Benefits

    There are many l benefits to implementing Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Flexible deployment options
    • Enterprise-grade high availability
    • Security automation to reduce complexity, leveraging REST API, scripts, connectors, and automation stitches
    • Multi-tenancy solution with quota management, leveraging (ADOMs) to separate customer data and manage domains for operational effectiveness and compliance

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Fortinet FortiAnalyzer solution.

    PeerSpot user Imad A., Group IT Manager at a manufacturing company, says, “You can monitor all appliances from a centralized location. You have a front dashboard for all our operations and all the logs. If you need to search for anything you can just dig deep into the logs. The solution offers excellent customizable reports. In our case, we needed a monthly report of all internet consumption, and we were able to easily create this.” He goes on to add, “There are pre-defined templates. The logs cover any question or need that we populate within these templates. However, you can also build your own template. There is great analytics that can be used in different departments. For example, our marketing department can go more into media patterns and not just into browsing patterns. Everything is easily visible and can be tracked and studied.”

    Luis G., Systems Architect at Zentius, mentions, “Log collection is the most valuable [feature]. The UI looks great. It has a very good look and feel. We don't have the need to use solid state drives. We use mechanic drives, and we don't see any performance issues, so basically, it is doing fine.”

    Rupsan S., Technical Presales Engineer at Dristi Tech Pvt.ltd., comments, "The feature that I have found the most valuable is to be able to see everything in our network in a single task. A single menu and the graphical bar charts that it provides to give insights are very useful. It also gives very good metrics on bandwidth utilization, CPU, and device performance. It is very simple and easy to use as well."

    Dilip S., Regional Head at Mass Infonet (P) Ltd., explains, “With FortiAnalyzer, you can see what the user is doing and what sites he goes to. You can also see how much quota there is and how much (size-wise) you want to hit, as well as what the incoming or outbound traffic is, and if it is through the ISP or not. Basically, you can see absolutely all activity using FortiAnalyzer. The solution is very complete. The product is very simple to use. It's regularly updated with many versions constantly adding more content and information. The solution has sandboxing, IPS, and DPS as well. The solution allows for a lot of customization.”

    Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

    The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

    By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

    Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

    Sample Customers
    General Directorate of Information Technology
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business49%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Grafana Loki
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Grafana Loki and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is ranked 8th in Log Management with 81 reviews while Grafana Loki is ranked 14th in Log Management with 12 reviews. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is rated 8.0, while Grafana Loki is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer writes "We can automate event-based handling solutions, is stable, and is great for heavy traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana Loki writes "Effective for Logging, recovery from node failures is fast and single UI supports metrics, logs, and even tracing". Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog, LogRhythm SIEM and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, whereas Grafana Loki is most compared with Graylog, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and Datadog. See our Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Grafana Loki report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.