We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiDDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was really easy."
"The most valuable feature is the cloud DDoS scrubbing capability."
"The solution already has security profiles and it can protect from DDoS attacks and other kinds of attacks."
"This solution can protect Layer 3, Layer 4 and Layer 7 attacks of applications for us."
"The solution is very user-friendly and very easy to use."
"I find the interface easy to use."
"We have researched them all, and it's a good solution all around."
"It is a user-friendly product in terms of monitoring and updating policies."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It has not gone down for a quite long time. It's working fine."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create signatures on-demand."
"Technologically simple and effective."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"The important features include automated protection and defense against many attacks, it's important that our networks are protected in the Radware cloud."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"Radware DefensePro is one of the best solutions for on-premise protection."
"The solution can be a little more user-friendly and it can be more affordable."
"Alerts and reporting features must be improved."
"The web interface could be much better."
"I find that there have been issues in the past year with the solution hanging. It freezes often."
"All the thresholds that need to be configured should be included in the default so that user will not forget or misconfigure."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"I would like to see analytics, big data."
"The tool needs to focus more on the area of application traffic management, where it currently has some shortcomings."
"They should add artificial intelligence to the platform. It is currently missing the machine learning piece."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"I would like to see more graphics within the dashboard. Right now, you are required to buy tools in order to have graphical representation for your monitoring."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"There needs to be more reporting."
"Right now, we have DefensePro 6. The only complaint I have is that SSL inspection, when activated, consumes a lot of resources on the machine. We are currently reviewing a possible change to DefensePro X, the new version, which has a separate module with its processors."
"This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."
"It could incorporate more intelligence for reacting with web site visitors."
Fortinet FortiDDoS is ranked 16th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 12 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 21 reviews. Fortinet FortiDDoS is rated 8.4, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiDDoS writes "Offers good technical support but has poor scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Fortinet FortiDDoS is most compared with Arbor DDoS, VMware NSX, Fortinet FortiWeb, Edgio Global CDN and Cloudflare, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and Corero. See our Fortinet FortiDDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.