Compare Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Verizon Software Defined Perimeter

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: September 2021.
534,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a subscription-based license, which is based on the usage and number of concurrent users.""The licensing fees are a little bit high.""The pricing is similar to that of other solutions."

More Fortinet FortiNAC Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
534,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable.
Top Answer: I believe there are three types of licenses based on three uses: visibility, control, and response — if I remember correctly.
Top Answer: Overall, it's a great product. The GUI is a little bit strange — different than other Fortinet products. It could be more user-friendly.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
9,383
Comparisons
5,943
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
442
Rating
8.3
15th
out of 24 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
397
Comparisons
327
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
FortiNAC, Bradford Networks, Bradford Networks Sentry, Network Sentry Family
Vidder, Verizon Vidder PrecisionAccess, Verizon PrecisionAccess, Vidder PrecisionAccess, PrecisionAccess, Verizon SDP
Learn More
Verizon
Video Not Available
Overview

The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, has made it necessary for organizations to improve their visibility into what is attached to their networks. They need to know every device and every user accessing their networks. IoT devices enable digital transformation initiatives and improve efficiency, flexibility, and optimization. However, they are inherently untrustworthy, with designs that prioritize low-cost over security. FortiNAC provides the network visibility to see everything connected to the network, as well as the ability to control those devices and users, including dynamic, automated responses.

Vidder's PrecisionAccess screens both user and device to ensure they’re trusted before connecting them to protected applications — in three simple steps:

  1. Isolate the application so it’s invisible to everyone on the untrusted network.
  2. Verify user authenticity and authorization, and device trustworthiness.
  3. Connect the authorized user and trusted device to only the protected applications.
Offer
Learn more about Fortinet FortiNAC
Learn more about Verizon Software Defined Perimeter
Sample Customers
Isavia, Pepperdine University, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia University Medical Center, Utah Valley University
Comtrade
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Government14%
Educational Organization14%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company21%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider42%
Computer Software Company24%
Government6%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise29%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise59%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: September 2021.
534,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 9 reviews while Verizon Software Defined Perimeter is ranked 15th in ZTNA as a Service. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 8.2, while Verizon Software Defined Perimeter is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "Enhances the Security Fabric with visibility, control, and automated response for everything that connects to the network & protection against IoT threats extending control to third-party devices". On the other hand, Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Portnox CORE and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Verizon Software Defined Perimeter is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Zscaler Private Access, Appgate SDP and Aruba ClearPass.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.