Sentry vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
froglogic Logo
290 views|76 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Sentry Logo
600 views|525 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between froglogic Coco Code Coverage and Sentry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sentry, BugSnag, GNU and others in Debugging.
To learn more, read our detailed Polyspace Bug Finder vs. Sentry Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"If somebody is using a kind of Squish as a regression testing tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be used in parallel because these two particular products can communicate with one another."

More froglogic Coco Code Coverage Pros →

"Sentry is a pretty stable product... Sentry's documentation is pretty straightforward and neat.""Sentry breaks everything down in real time.""Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs.""The solution is user-friendly.""It's a great visibility tool for the developer team.""The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides.""Its initial setup process is relatively straightforward.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users."

More Sentry Pros →

Cons
"froglogic Coco Code Coverage could improve by adding more computer programing language, it would be better. It only covers four languages."

More froglogic Coco Code Coverage Cons →

"The price could be lowered.""Lacks user metric tracking and the ability to create more dashboards.""It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location.""I would like to see a role registration feature added.""The settings for an administrator are complex.""I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release.""The log centralization and analysis could be improved in Sentry.""We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved."

More Sentry Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."
  • "I am currently using a self-hosted open version."
  • "We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."
  • "We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."
  • More Sentry Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Debugging solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product costs $26 a month if we choose a yearly subscription. Code coverage can be added for an additional $29 per month. The Team plan is the cheapest package available. We can make our own… more »
    Top Answer:It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 13 in Debugging
    Views
    290
    Comparisons
    76
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    out of 13 in Debugging
    Views
    600
    Comparisons
    525
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Sentry
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    The Coco code coverage tool is a complete, cross-platform, cross-compiler tool chain allowing to analyze the test coverage of C, C++, C# and Tcl code.

    Coco is used to

    • Find and highlight untested code sections
    • Find redundant tests (i.e., tests that merely duplicate others)
    • Find unreachable code
    • Compute the optimal order of test execution that will maximize the overall coverage
    • Compare the test coverage of two application versions or test executions.

    Sentry’s real-time error tracking gives you insight into production deployments and information to reproduce and fix crashes.

    Sample Customers
    Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
    Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business70%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Polyspace Bug Finder vs. Sentry
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Polyspace Bug Finder vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    froglogic Coco Code Coverage is ranked 6th in Debugging while Sentry is ranked 1st in Debugging with 11 reviews. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is rated 7.0, while Sentry is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of froglogic Coco Code Coverage writes "Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sentry writes "An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing". froglogic Coco Code Coverage is most compared with , whereas Sentry is most compared with Azure Monitor, Grafana, Elastic Observability, New Relic and AWS X-Ray.

    See our list of best Debugging vendors.

    We monitor all Debugging reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.