We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
"The price is okay."
Earn 20 points
GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.
Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 16 reviews while Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation. GitLab is rated 8.2, while Harness is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Provides or mandates quantitative code into the Master". On the other hand, GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TeamCity, Tekton, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and GoCD, whereas Harness is most compared with Jenkins, CircleCI, Bamboo, TeamCity and Tekton.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.