We performed a comparison between GitLab and Incredibuild based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The solution is stable."
"CI/CD is valuable for me."
"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."
"GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment."
"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."
"The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."
"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."
"The most valuable functionality of GitLab, for me, is the DevOps. Besides the normal source control based on Git, I find the Auto DevOps features most important in the solution."
"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation."
"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."
"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository. Resolving that issue would make the product better. My team quickly fixed it by writing a small script, then double-clicking or enabling the script to take care of the issue. However, that quick fix was from my team and not the GitLab team, so in the next release, if an automatic deployment feature would be available in GitLab, then that would be good because, in Visual Studio, you can do that with just one click of a button."
"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required."
"In the free version, when a merge request is raised, there is no way to enforce certain rules. We can't enforce that this merge request must be reviewed or approved by two or three people in the team before it is pushed to the master branch. That's why we are exploring using some agents."
"GitLab's UI could be improved."
"The tool should include a feature that helps to edit the code directly."
"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
Earn 20 points
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Incredibuild is ranked 20th in Build Automation. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Incredibuild is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Incredibuild writes "Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube and Tekton, whereas Incredibuild is most compared with Bazel, TeamCity and Jenkins.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
