Compare GitLab vs. NowSecure

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,050 views|36,935 comparisons
GitLab Logo
5,575 views|4,884 comparisons
NowSecure Logo
345 views|206 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use NowSecure? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.""No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.""They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: JaeLee, check out our comparison page here of Veracode vs Checkmarx… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend Veracode. Our uses cases included removing vulnerable code from our Product and ensuring the product… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Learn
Veracode
GitLab
NowSecure
Video Not Available
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.

NowSecure experts have conducted advanced pen testing for some of the world's most demanding organizations - including banks, insurance companies, government agencies, healthcare organizations, retail conglomerates, high-tech businesses, and more. Mobile apps are prone to sensitive data leakages and attacks, yet a manual test for just one app can take several weeks. To enable faster, more frequent testing, we built a test engine that successfully automates repeatable and time-consuming mobile appsec testing, remediation and reporting tasks. The result - the foundation of the NowSecure platform, which significantly reduces testing time and costs without compromising full depth of security coverage.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about GitLab
Learn more about NowSecure
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerSiemens, University of Washington, Equinix, Paessler AG, CNCF, Ticketmaster, CERN, VaadinVaporstream, FIS, MEA Financial, Silent Circle, Capital One, Citi, EY, EMC, Emerson, Kaiser Permanente, The Home Depot, Humana, Shell, Kellogg's, TD Bank, VMware
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company13%
Retailer6%
Pharma/Biotech Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government7%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GitLab is ranked 14th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 5 reviews while NowSecure is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST). GitLab is rated 8.6, while NowSecure is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Provides or mandates quantitative code into the Master". On the other hand, GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tekton, TeamCity, Bamboo and CircleCI, whereas NowSecure is most compared with ImmuniWeb, Checkmarx and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.