GitLab vs SonarCloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
3,627 views|2,873 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Sonar Logo
10,008 views|7,371 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitLab and SonarCloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Testing (AST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. SonarCloud Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature.""It scales well.""We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people.""The solution's service delivery model is fantastic.""I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand.""CI/CD is valuable for me.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code.""I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus."

More GitLab Pros →

"The most valuable feature of SonarCloud is its overall performance.""I'm not implementing the solutions. However, I've talked to the people who deploy the tools, and they are happy with how easy setting up SonarCloud is.""For what it is meant to do, it works pretty well.""The reports from SonarCloud are very good.""The solution can be installed locally.""SonarCloud is overall a good tool for identifying code smells, bugs, and code duplication, but we've found that using Android Lint is more effective for our needs.""Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.""Its dashboard provides a unified view of various code quality metrics, including code duplication, unit test coverage, and security hotspots."

More SonarCloud Pros →

Cons
"It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security.""I would like to see security increased in the future. A secure environment is very important.""GitLab could add a plugin to integrate with Kubernetes stuff.""We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating.""GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful.""Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good.""Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors.""The solution could be faster."

More GitLab Cons →

"The solution needs to improve its customization and flexibility.""It would be helpful if notifications could go out to an extra person.""We had some issues with the scanner.""The reports could improve by providing more information. We are not able to use the reports in our operation until they are improved. Additionally, if the vendor provided more customization capabilities it would be a benefit.""The documentation needs improvement on optimizing build time for seamless CI/CD integration with our Android apps.""SonarCloud can improve the false positives. Sometimes the gates sometimes act a little weird. We then need to manually go and mark the false positive.""CI/CD pipeline is part of a whole chain of design, development, and production, and it's becoming increasingly crucial to optimize the various tools across different stages. However, it's still a silo approach because the full integration is missing. This isn't just an issue with SonarCloud. It's a general problem with tooling.""I've been told by the developers that the solution is too limited. It's not testing enough within the containers."

More SonarCloud Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of SonarCloud could be less expensive. We are using the community version and the price should be more reasonable."
  • "The price of SonarCloud is not expensive, it goes by the lines of code. 1 million lines per code are approximately 4,000 USD per year. If you need 2 million lines of code you would double the annual cost."
  • "I am using the free version of the solution."
  • "I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
  • "While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value."
  • "The current pricing is quite cheap."
  • More SonarCloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Top Answer:Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.
    Top Answer:I would rate the price an eight out of ten because it's reasonable. While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value. It's an all-inclusive package where you pay a… more »
    Top Answer:There's room for improvement in the configuration process, particularly during the initial setup phase. Setting up features like mono reports can be challenging, and the existing documentation could… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,627
    Comparisons
    2,873
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    10,008
    Comparisons
    7,371
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    524
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 48% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 77% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Checkmarx One logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    OWASP Zap logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Coverity logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Interactive Demo
    GitLab
    Demo Not Available
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    SonarCloud is a cloud-based alternative of the SonarQube platform, offering continuous code quality and security analysis as a service. SonarCloud integrates seamlessly with popular version control and CI/CD platforms such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps. It provides static code analysis to identify and help remediate issues such as bugs and security vulnerabilities. SonarCloud enables developers to receive immediate feedback on their code within their development environment, facilitating the maintenance of high-quality code standards, and promoting a culture of continuous improvement in software development projects. It helps produce software that is secure, reliable, and maintainable. SonarCloud is free for open-source projects and is offered as a paid subscription for private projects, priced per lines of code.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitLab vs. SonarCloud
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. SonarCloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 7th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 70 reviews while SonarCloud is ranked 10th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 10 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while SonarCloud is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarCloud writes "Beneficial vulnerability discovery, simple to maintain, and proactive support". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube and Tekton, whereas SonarCloud is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Checkmarx One, OWASP Zap and Coverity. See our GitLab vs. SonarCloud report.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.