Ranking | |
Views 30 Comparisons 9 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 123 Comparisons 82 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, IBM, Inflectra and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: January 2021. 457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 100% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
Case SPEC, Analyst Pro | Rational Focal Point |
Learn | |
Goda Video Not Available | IBM |
Overview | |
Advanced requirements, test cases and life cycle management software. Items (requirements, test scripts, etc.) can be arranged in multilevel hierarchies and linked in any arbitrary fashion to other items, files (documents, code fragments etc) or diagrams. Full graphical and tabular traceability is provided with drill-down to lower levels. A change in an object such as a User Requirement automatically flags directly and indirectly linked objects such as test steps as suspect, to be re-evaluated. | IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Goda Case SPEC | Learn more about IBM Rational Focal Point |
Sample Customers | |
Cytonome Inc, Accenture, Cherokee Information Services, The Arborsys Group | SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank |
Goda Case SPEC is ranked 17th in Application Requirements Management while IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 15th in Application Requirements Management. Goda Case SPEC is rated 0.0, while IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Goda Case SPEC is most compared with , whereas IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with Jira.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.