We performed a comparison between Goliath Performance Monitor and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Offers a diversity of features."
"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"It helped us consolidate all our solutions into an easy tool to use for various employees."
"It is very stable. We have not had any problems."
"Splunk Enterprise Security helped us with faster detection of threats."
"We have a more secure, robust environment, which keeps the harmful software out of the zone required."
"Splunk can extract all kinds of data. There's no limitation on what kind of structured and unstructured data one needs to extract — it can access any kind of data, including machine-generated data."
"Three features stand out for me: the SDK for writing Python, the customizable and adaptable diagnostic dashboard, and the optimizer for collecting data."
"The technical support has been very good. They are very responsive and have been helpful."
"The product is good, it satisfies our customers."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
"Most of my interaction is with the user community, which is how Splunk wants it. When I need help, that community is very hit or miss."
"I would like to see more SIEM functionality and a better ticket tool."
"It requires a significant amount of relatively complex architecture once you push past the single server instance."
"They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match."
"It needs integration with a configuration management solution."
"A lot of people are averse to using new tools so if they make it even more user-friendly than it already is, I think that could go a long way."
"Splunk could enhance its services by providing more comprehensive professional assistance aimed at optimizing our investment."
"Its pricing is extremely high. There are other tools out in the market that are competitive. They do not necessarily have all the functionality, but they are competitive. The professional services we have used have been high as well in comparison to the market."
Earn 20 points
Goliath Performance Monitor is ranked 60th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 228 reviews. Goliath Performance Monitor is rated 7.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Goliath Performance Monitor writes "Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Goliath Performance Monitor is most compared with ControlUp, Zabbix and eG Enterprise, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.