We performed a comparison between Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."
"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."
"Google's technical support is very good."
"I like the monitoring feature."
"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."
"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."
More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pros →
"Improves visibility and has a great new dashboard."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features are the AI assistant, which is good at detecting known types of behavior."
"It does good correlation for events. It does good general analysis, and it has good apps as well."
"It integrates very easily with other solutions. The solution is flexible. We can add anything to it, as it is a good companion to other tools."
"Overall a great solution."
"The product has plenty of features and capabilities."
"We've found the technical support to be very good."
"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."
"It could be even more automated."
"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."
"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."
"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."
"The logging functionality could be better."
"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."
"It could be more stable."
More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Cons →
"There is room for improvement in IBM QRadar in integrating features for SOC maturity and security levels directly into QRadar."
"It would be good if the program allowed certain profiles to only see certain customer information."
"Search capability and indexing still lag behind competitors. We also need to see improved rule based access controls and rule/event tuning."
"Each module requires a separate license and a separate cost."
"The price of IBM Security QRadar is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would like to see more integration in place after the security lock."
"Whenever we are upgrading or installing any type of patch, at that time we have some delays."
"Needs better visualization options beyond the time series charts and a few other options that they have."
More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is ranked 27th in Log Management with 9 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is rated 7.8, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) writes "Good logging and tracing but does need more profiling capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is most compared with AWS X-Ray, Datadog, Azure Monitor, Amazon CloudWatch and Grafana, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.