Compare Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Diagnostics

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Diagnostics and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private.""This solution makes it a lot easier to figure out trends within very different data sources, which makes it easy to see why something is misbehaving.""The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities.""People are very pleased with the implementation.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation.""No issues with stability."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pros »

"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports.""The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS.""Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

More Google Stackdriver Pros »

"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."

More Micro Focus Diagnostics Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack.""I would like to see more out-of-the-box dashboards for in-depth application monitoring of standard products that are out there.""In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get.""The implementation is a long process that should be improved.""They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us.""It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Cons »

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver.""It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost.""Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

More Google Stackdriver Cons »

"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."

More Micro Focus Diagnostics Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Educational pricing is available for this solution.""We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.""Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

More VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

More Google Stackdriver Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It’s in INR. Our data is on four sites and these are in the development phase. Different locations require different… more »
Top Answer: It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS.
Top Answer: The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage.
Top Answer: The APM functionality needs to be improved. It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost… more »
Top Answer: The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects.
Top Answer: The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI.
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution so that our clients can see data from us.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 65% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver LoggingMF Diagnostics
Learn
VMware
Google
Micro Focus
Overview

VMware Tanzu Observability provides metrics-driven analytics at massive scale, so you can get the most out of your cloud-native apps.

Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster. It is natively integrated with Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and popular open source packages. Stackdriver provides a wide variety of metrics, dashboards, alerting, log management, reporting, and tracing capabilities.

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
Offer
Learn more about VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront
Learn more about Google Stackdriver
Learn more about Micro Focus Diagnostics
Sample Customers
Box, Intuit, Workday, Groupon, British Gas, SpaceApe, Marketo, DoordDash, LyftUber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail GamesBSkyB, Alior Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Media Company13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Retailer8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Diagnostics and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Google Stackdriver is ranked 15th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews while Micro Focus Diagnostics is ranked 31st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Google Stackdriver is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Diagnostics is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Google Stackdriver writes "Provides visibility into the performance uptime and the overall health of our cloud applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". Google Stackdriver is most compared with Datadog, ELK Logstash, Splunk, Dynatrace and Amazon CloudWatch, whereas Micro Focus Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and SiteScope. See our Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Diagnostics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.