We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Google Stackdriver vs. Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: October 2021.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage.""The cost could be lower."

More Google Stackdriver Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Google's technical support is very good.
Top Answer: The cost could be lower. When it comes to the cost component in cloud, it is problematic that we are only in a position to know how much we must pay upon arrival of the invoice after 15 days.
Top Answer: While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace. We would like to improve the application log. Most… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
7,326
Comparisons
6,606
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
370
Rating
8.0
Unranked
In Application Performance Management (APM)
Comparisons
Also Known As
Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging
Foglight, Dell Foglight
Learn More
Quest Software
Video Not Available
Overview

Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster. It is natively integrated with Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and popular open source packages. Stackdriver provides a wide variety of metrics, dashboards, alerting, log management, reporting, and tracing capabilities.

Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.
Offer
Learn more about Google Stackdriver
Learn more about Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]
Sample Customers
Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games
Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm44%
Healthcare Company11%
Educational Organization11%
Computer Software Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Healthcare Company9%
Comms Service Provider7%
Educational Organization6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: October 2021.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Google Stackdriver is ranked 15th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is ranked unranked in Application Performance Management (APM). Google Stackdriver is rated 8.0, while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Google Stackdriver writes "Provides visibility into the performance uptime and the overall health of our cloud applications". On the other hand, Google Stackdriver is most compared with ELK Logstash, Datadog, Azure Monitor, AWS X-Ray and Splunk, whereas Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.