We performed a comparison between Grafana and JenniferSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."It integrates well with other solutions."
"It gives us the visibility we need. I like that when we add deployment markers or release markers, we know exactly when an issue arises. For instance, if there is an increased usage of CPU, we can link it directly to the deployment that might have caused the issue. It increases productivity and observability. We can now easily tell when a certain issue arises. It's way easier to debug because it can point you to certain things based on these markers, and we can debug easier."
"The most valuable feature of Grafana is the ease to build dashboards from observability construction. Additionally, the page services and integration are good."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"Grafana is able to connect with multiple data sources, unlike Elasticsearch."
"Great capacity planning and the solution has a great GUI."
"Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days."
"Grafana's best features are live monitoring and alerts."
"The dashboard is a valuable feature."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"It's difficult to see the trends on the graph when the range is too long."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"One area for improvement in Grafana is that depending on your version, you have to pay for the features, making the license expensive. It would be great if the licensing model could be more flexible. In the next release of Grafana, I want cluster creation to be available, which would help in Grafana deployment and scaling. Currently, the scaling process for the solution is a bit complicated."
"I find issues with Grafana. For example, I am unable to open some services there. Then, we have to open ten different tabs to get it fixed. And it's annoying when there's something going on; we want to check Grafana, and it throws four different errors."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"The formatting could be better."
"The solution is pricy and has room for improvement."
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews while JenniferSoft is ranked 50th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. Grafana is rated 8.0, while JenniferSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability, whereas JenniferSoft is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.