GroundWork Monitor vs SAP IT Operations Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GroundWork Logo
70 views|60 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
122 views|105 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GroundWork Monitor and SAP IT Operations Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The license for the product ranges from 8,000 to 30,000 yearly, depending on the customer's sizing. While it may not be cheap, it is considered affordable for the value it provides."
  • More SAP IT Operations Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    20th
    Views
    70
    Comparisons
    60
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    15th
    Views
    122
    Comparisons
    105
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    GWOS
    Learn More
    Overview
    Open source IT infrastructure monitoring system that collects performance data for systems, applications, and security.
    SAP IT Operations Analytics gives you holistic visibility into your entire hardware and appli-cation landscape by aggregating data sources within one layer. Network topology, system log data, and external message catalogs can now be combined to provide one comprehen-sive view of the network. This helps your IT department detect incidents more quickly. SAP IT Operations Analytics integrates data sources from different layers so logs from multiple layers can be combined into one consistent, simplified data model. The sources of data can include services, applica-tions, operating systems, or even end-user devices at the top. They can go so deep as to include data from servers, the network, or storage – including sensors – in the data center, making the IT department can now correlate data patterns from multiple streams with extreme efficiency to find root causes to problems.
    Sample Customers
    Swiss Life, JBFCS, Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre
    Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Operations Analytics
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GroundWork Monitor is ranked 20th in IT Operations Analytics while SAP IT Operations Analytics is ranked 15th in IT Operations Analytics with 2 reviews. GroundWork Monitor is rated 8.0, while SAP IT Operations Analytics is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GroundWork Monitor writes "It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write. When we need to, the threshold is easy to change". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP IT Operations Analytics writes "Helps to track the lifecycle of SAP products from inception to end-of-life". GroundWork Monitor is most compared with New Relic, whereas SAP IT Operations Analytics is most compared with Moogsoft.

    See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

    We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.