HCL AppScan vs Qualitia Automation Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HCLTech Logo
5,557 views|4,286 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Qualitia Software Logo
181 views|109 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HCL AppScan and Qualitia Automation Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production.""It has certainly helped us find vulnerabilities in our software, so this is priceless in the end.""It identifies all the URLs and domains on its own and then performs tests and provides the results.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution...The initial setup or installation of HCL AppScan is easy.""We use it as a security testing application.""The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman.""Technical support is helpful.""I like the recording feature."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."

More Qualitia Automation Studio Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources.""The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed.""The tool should improve its output. Scanning is not a challenge anymore since there are many such tools available in the market. The product needs to focus on how its output is being used by end users. It should be also more user-friendly. One of the major challenges is in the tool's integration with applications that need to be scanned. Sometimes, the scanning is not proper.""One thing which I think can be improved is the CI/CD Integration""If HCL AppScan is able to alert the clients over email once the scan is complete, it would be great. Right now, HCL AppScan doesn't let me know if the scanning part is finished or not, because of which I have to come back and check mostly.""It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good.""The solution could improve by having a mobile version.""Many silly false positives are produced."

More HCL AppScan Cons →

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."

More Qualitia Automation Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
  • More Qualitia Automation Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan generates false results. Sometimes, it incorrectly identifies requests as vulnerable when they are not vulnerable. In the ADSL feature managed, the primary objective is to identify… more »
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan efficiently scans through the website and identifies vulnerabilities for AWS. It is reducing tools day by day, making it more efficient.
    Top Answer:The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it.
    Top Answer:Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution.
    Top Answer:The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,557
    Comparisons
    4,286
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    7.2
    23rd
    Views
    181
    Comparisons
    109
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    307
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Qualitia Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Qualitia gives you simple step wise approach to quickly build your test automation and handle complexities easily with its unique scriptless approach. Qualitia gives you smart alerts and analysis to adopt changes effectively, making it agile friendly.
    Sample Customers
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Insurance Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HCL AppScan is ranked 14th in Application Security Tools with 39 reviews while Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. HCL AppScan is rated 7.6, while Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, Checkmarx One and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.