Compare HCL AppScan vs. Quotium Seeker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
68,637 views|36,900 comparisons
HCL AppScan Logo
12,555 views|8,819 comparisons
Quotium Seeker Logo
162 views|112 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive.""The pricing is really fair compared to a lot of other tools on the market.""It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The main feature that I have found valuable is the solution's ability to find issues in static analysis. Additionally… more »
Top Answer: I don't have enough information to be able to comment on the cost of licensing the product. That's more of a sales… more »
Top Answer: The reports on offer are too verbose. They might want to consider t restructuring their reports to better give a very… more »
Top Answer: The solution offers services in a few specific development languages.
Top Answer: They have to improve support. Their support before, when it was IBM, was very good technical support. However, now, it's… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for static analysis.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
Seeker
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

The Seeker solution helps businesses find high-risk security weaknesses while fostering collaboration between development and security teams. It exposes vulnerable code and ties it directly to business impact and exploitation scenarios, providing a clear explanation of risks. By accelerating adoption of security testing technologies into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), customers across industries such as financial, health, energy and retail can get to market faster with increased stability and certainty.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about HCL AppScan
Learn more about Quotium Seeker
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
El Al
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Computer Software Company10%
Insurance Company10%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Government27%
Manufacturing Company18%
Insurance Company18%
Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government5%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise52%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise49%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise68%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HCL AppScan is ranked 18th in Application Security with 3 reviews while Quotium Seeker is ranked 35th in Application Security. HCL AppScan is rated 7.0, while Quotium Seeker is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes "Allows for dynamic scanning but lacks easy CI/CD integration". On the other hand, HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx, OWASP Zap and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Quotium Seeker is most compared with Contrast Security Assess.

See our list of best Application Security vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.